Accelerating clinical evaluation in healthcare and life sciences: How AI is eliminating manual inefficiencies

Digital intelligence is elevating the speed, quality and reliability of clinical documentation workflows
Abonnieren
5 min 20 sec Lesen
Vinod Kumar Dasari
Vinod Kumar Dasari
Senior Technical Manager, HCLTech
5 min 20 sec Lesen
microphone microphone Artikel anhören
30 s zurück
0:00 0:00
30 s vor
Accelerating clinical evaluation in healthcare and life sciences: How AI is eliminating manual inefficiencies

In healthcare, time isn’t just about precision; it shapes outcomes. Over the past decade, the industry has witnessed a wave of transformative innovations, ranging from connected medical devices and real-time monitoring systems to AI-assisted diagnostics. As the volume and complexity of clinical data continue to surge, organizations are realizing that traditional, manual processes can no longer keep pace. To maintain both regulatory rigor and innovation speed, there’s an increasing need to bring intelligence and automation into clinical evaluation workflows. 

In this fast-evolving landscape, the focus is not on replacing human expertise but on enhancing it through AI-powered efficiency. This also applies to the Clinical Evaluation Reports (CERs) writing domain, where is being leveraged to enable clinical teams to generate reports in a faster and more efficient manner that are fully compliant with global standards, such as EU MDR 2017/745, including MDCG guidance documents According to McKinsey, AI could unlock a 35-45% productivity boost in clinical development.

Where the bottlenecks lie

Before innovation can deliver an impact, process inefficiencies must be addressed. Common challenges include:

  • Manual literature review and data fragmentation
    Medical writers and clinical experts often go through numerous papers, reports, regulatory filings and post-market surveillance documents. Fragmented, multi-format data makes capturing the most current and relevant evidence difficult.
  • Collaboration silos and traceability gaps
    Document versioning, reviewer comments across email threads and a lack of unified platforms contribute to delays. More importantly, in audits or regulatory reviews, it can be hard to demonstrate who approved what, when and under what evidence.
  • Information overload and risk of outdated evidence
    The volume of medical literature is increasing exponentially. Manual methods struggle to filter for quality, bias and relevance, resulting in missed evidence or overlooking critical safety and performance parameters.
  • Resource‐intensive expert effort
    Experts are often provided with repetitive, low-value tasks like summarizing individual studies or formatting. This leads to diverting their time from high-value tasks like judgment, analysis and strategy.
  • The hidden cost of these inefficiencies is more than delays. It leads to slower submission cycles, increased costs, a greater risk of non-compliance or regulatory rejection and plagiarism.
     

How AI is bringing intelligence to clinical evaluation reports

AI is no longer experimental; it’s becoming the backbone of smarter, faster and more reliable clinical evaluation reporting. AI doesn’t replace clinical experts. It enhances their efficiency and competency. Let's explore how the AI is changing the equation:

Automation that speeds up research: Literature search, article screening, appraisal and data extraction, including leveraging reusable components from available documents, can now be completed in minutes. This means experts can focus their time on critical analysis and interpretation
 
Collaboration through shared platforms: Unified AI platforms provide writers, reviewers and regulatory teams with a shared workspace, featuring real-time document updates and built-in workflows that reduce bottlenecks and missed deadlines

Traceability through digital records: Every decision, every data source, every revision is logged automatically. That makes regulatory audits smoother and adds greater confidence in the process
 
Data-backed intelligence: AI tools pull structured evidence from global databases, including those for clinical trials and post-market surveillance. Decisions are based on the most current and comprehensive data available

The results of AI-enabled workflows in clinical reporting are not just theoretical but also measurable. A recent study showed that when advanced, AI-driven methods were applied, reporting accuracy improved from 59.5% to 93.4%, completeness rose from 46.1% to 96.6% and traceability leapt from 11.5% to 77.3%. These gains demonstrate how digital and AI-enabled systems can dramatically enhance the reliability of clinical data, transforming reporting environments into engines of precision and accountability.

It was shown that when advanced, AI-driven methods were applied, reporting accuracy improved from 59.5% to 93.4%, completeness rose from 46.1% to 96.6% and traceability leapt from 11.5% to 77.3%. These gains demonstrate how digital and AI-enabled systems can dramatically enhance the reliability of clinical data, transforming reporting environments into engines of precision and accountability.
 
AIRA: HCLTech’s intelligent clinical writing assistant

At HCLTech, this vision is already a reality with AIRA, an AI-powered assistant designed specifically for the complexities of clinical writing. Unlike generic AI tools, AIRA is engineered for the unique demands of clinical evaluation reports, regulatory submissions and compliance documentation.

How AIRA tackles industry challenges:

Automates the intake of literature, saving hundreds of expert hours that would otherwise be spent screening and grading articles

Streamlines collaboration with digital roundtables, unified workflows and real-time document sharing, reducing approval cycles and minimizing rework

Builds traceability into the process through AI-powered reporting agents that log every decision, every evidence source and every revision, ensuring audit readiness

How AIRA automated clinical evaluation for a global MedTech leader

A global medical technology company was struggling to keep pace with the growing volume of clinical evaluation documentation. Manual drafting consumed valuable expert time, introduced inconsistencies and slowed regulatory submissions. Literature reviews alone accounted for nearly 25% of the workload, requiring teams to sift through large volumes of studies.

By implementing AIRA, the company addressed these operational bottlenecks head-on. AIRA’s automated, end-to-end content generation and summarization capabilities significantly reduced manual effort, standardized literature screening and ensured every document aligned with regulatory requirements.

The impact was measurable. The client achieved full regulatory compliance, improved documentation accuracy by 90% and reduced literature review turnaround time by 40%. The effort required for periodic updates also dropped by 35%. The result was a scalable, reliable workflow that enabled faster decisions and consistent, audit-ready documentation.

Ethical and regulatory considerations

In healthcare, speed is important, but trust is essential. That trust depends on the responsible use of AI. Regulations such as the EU MDR and guidelines shaped by ISO standards require clinical AI systems to maintain transparent documentation, strong data governance and active human oversight. Equally critical is interpretability. Clinicians and regulators must be able to trace how AI-generated outputs are produced and validate their clinical relevance. 

A strategic call for industry leaders

For decision-makers in global healthcare and life sciences, the message is clear: AI is not an experiment. It’s an inevitability. The strategic question is how to harness it responsibly and effectively. Healthcare companies should focus on:

Building integrated platforms rather than point solutions. Fragmentation is the enemy of compliance and intelligence
 
Embedding AI into governance models, updating Quality Management Systems, documenting AI-specific risks and aligning with evolving global standards
 
Positioning compliance as a competitive edge. In a world where regulators demand transparency, being ahead of the curve becomes a differentiator
 
Measuring impact continuously. Time saved, errors avoided, audit readiness and patient safety improvements must all be tracked and reported
 
A clinical future rewritten

Clinical evaluation is more critical than ever and the scrutiny surrounding it continues to intensify. AI is transforming CERs from a regulatory obligation into a strategic capability, where human judgment and machine intelligence work in harmony to deliver reports with accuracy, speed and trust.

At HCLTech, we stand at the forefront of this shift, blending deep clinical domain expertise with cutting-edge digital transformation and intelligent automation. Through solutions like AIRA, we are helping global healthcare leaders strengthen compliance, accelerate evidence generation and unlock new levels of operational excellence.

The future of clinical evaluation will not just be faster; it will be smarter, more transparent and grounded in integrity. As the industry evolves, organizations that adopt responsible, AI-enabled workflows today will define the gold standard for tomorrow.

Are you ready to integrate and unlock the next level of intelligent clinical transformation with HCLTech? Talk to our experts today!

Special contribution from Suneet Chowdhury, Deputy General Manager, LSH, Medical Affairs.
ERS LSH Engineering Artikel Accelerating clinical evaluation in healthcare and life sciences: How AI is eliminating manual inefficiencies