記事を聴く
Key takeaways
- The current disruption reflects several overlapping shocks, not one isolated crisis
- Global energy trade flows have been redrawn over the last few years
- Route concentration and logistics volatility have exposed structural weaknesses in supply chains
- Resilience now depends on diversification, dynamic rerouting and better trade visibility
- AI and technology can help, but only as part of a broader redesign of supply chain architecture
Over the past several years, oil and gas supply chains have been operating in a much more volatile environment. What was once treated as an occasional disruption is now better understood as a structural condition, shaped by geopolitics, conflict, shifting trade flows, route instability, supply concentration and rising cost pressure across the value chain.
That change has forced the industry to rethink how resilience is built. The question is no longer how to respond to a single shock. It is how to operate effectively in a market where disruption can emerge from multiple directions at once, affecting sourcing, logistics, production planning and commercial decision-making.
A supply chain reshaped by overlapping shocks
One of the clearest shifts has been the reconfiguration of global gas and LNG flows. By 2025, Russia’s share of EU gas imports had fallen to around 12.7%, while the United States had become the dominant LNG supplier to Europe, accounting for 56% of EU LNG imports by the fourth quarter of 2025. That change illustrates how quickly supply relationships can be redrawn when markets are under pressure.
At the same time, shipping networks have remained under strain. The UN Trade and Development organization noted that, as of June 2025, ship transit patterns through the Red Sea passage had still not returned to normal, with operators continuing to avoid the Suez Canal and absorb higher costs, delays and insurance exposure. For oil and gas, that has translated into longer lead times, more volatile freight economics and a less predictable logistics environment.
The other structural issue is concentration risk. In the first half of 2025, total oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz averaged 20.9 million barrels per day, according to the US Energy Information Administration. That scale of throughput underlines how much the global energy system still depends on a relatively small number of critical transit routes.
What matters is not any single event in isolation, but the cumulative effect of repeated shocks on a supply chain that was designed for a more stable operating model. Energy flows have become more dynamic, freight economics more variable and response times more important. That is what makes resilience a strategic priority rather than a contingency exercise.
Resilience is now a design principle
A few years ago, many supply chains were still designed primarily around efficiency, scale and cost. Today, that is no longer sufficient. The lesson from the last several years is that resilience must be engineered into the network.
That starts with diversification. If a country, refiner or major buyer is too dependent on one producing region, one route or one contract structure, it is exposed. The market response has shown that diversification is possible, but it requires a different mindset around sourcing, contracting and logistics.
Resilience also must be built around optionality. That means creating room to shift supply, reroute cargoes, rebalance inventories and respond faster when conditions change. In practice, this is less about replacing efficiency and more about redefining it. The most resilient supply chains now need to be both lean and flexible.
Where the pressure is being felt most
The impact is being felt across the value chain. Production planning has become more complex because lower output or higher risk in one region can quickly create pressure elsewhere. Freight and vessel allocation have become more strategic because the industry remains heavily dependent on long-haul shipping for both crude and LNG. Trade flows have become more fluid and more opportunistic as market participants work around disruption rather than through it.
Commercially, the pressure shows up in higher landed cost, greater exposure to spot markets and more active trading as suppliers and buyers try to rebalance positions. The EIA now expects Brent crude oil to average $91 per barrel in the second quarter of 2026, reflecting the way supply chain instability continues to influence market pricing.
The pressure is not limited to large producers or major importers. It also extends to smaller markets that are more dependent on traditional supply arrangements and have less flexibility in how they source, store or reroute energy. That is why resilience can no longer be viewed only through the lens of scale. It also must be viewed through the lens of adaptability.
The short-term response: Rerouting and diversification
In the near term, the industry response has centered on rerouting and diversification. Importing countries and large buyers are looking for secondary and tertiary supply options, even when those options are farther away or more expensive. That includes a greater willingness to source from nontraditional partners if it improves continuity of supply.
This is not the most efficient model in narrow cost terms, but it is a practical one. In the short term, resilience often means accepting higher cost in exchange for greater reliability. That can involve longer routes, more logistics complexity and a broader mix of suppliers, but it also reduces exposure to single points of failure.
More companies are also strengthening internal visibility across sourcing, logistics and inventory positions so they can respond faster when conditions shift. That type of coordination was once seen as a performance advantage. It is now becoming a baseline requirement.
The long-term shift: From efficiency to optionality
The more important shift is longer-term. The industry now needs to redesign supply chains around optionality. That means diversifying not only source, but also route, mode and commercial strategy.
Real-time trade tracking becomes much more important in this environment. So does dynamic logistical rerouting, where cargo and vessel movements can be re-optimized based on market conditions as they evolve. Some larger buyers and national systems are already moving in this direction through centralized command centers and tighter market intelligence.
The next step is to make these capabilities more predictive, not just reactive. That requires a stronger data foundation, better connectivity across the value chain and decision-making models that can respond at speed. The supply chain of the future will not be defined only by where energy comes from. It will be defined by how quickly the system can adapt when conditions change.
Where AI can make a difference
This is where AI can become useful. AI will not remove the structural risk, but it can improve how companies respond to it. The most practical use cases are in trade tracking, inventory balancing, scenario planning and route optimization.
If organizations can identify disruption earlier, assess alternate sourcing faster and understand the downstream implications in near real time, they can make better decisions under pressure. AI can also support dynamic visibility across networks that have become too complex to manage through manual coordination alone.
However, capturing AI’s value requires a foundation of modern data and process architecture. The organizations that benefit most from supply chain AI are those that invest in data integration, connectivity and flexibility across the value chain. AI can’t compensate for a system that remains overly concentrated or siloed. If the underlying systems can’t communicate (for example, if inventory data, shipping schedules and market forecasts reside in disconnected silos), even the smartest algorithms will be working with blind spots.
Leading oil and gas firms recognize that digital infrastructure and architecture are now strategic: robust data pipelines, cloud-based platforms and IT/OT integration are prerequisites so that AI solutions have high-quality, timely data from every critical node of the supply network.
From the supply chain network perspective, some of these supply chain models were built over decades, when route stability and regional dependence looked efficient. Those assumptions now need to be revisited. The priority is to build multi-source networks that can flex across regions and routes without undermining commercial performance. That means balancing resilience with cost, sustainability and growth. Longer routes and fragmented sourcing can increase both emissions and working capital, so resilience must be designed intelligently, not pursued at any price.
What leaders should prioritize now
The priorities for leaders are becoming clearer.
- Diversify sourcing and route architecture so that no critical flow depends too heavily on one geography.
- Invest in real-time trade and logistics visibility, because speed of decision is now a strategic capability.
- Strengthen command-center models that connect procurement, shipping, trading and operations.
- Use AI selectively to improve rerouting, forecasting and scenario analysis.
- Revisit downstream infrastructure and consumption models so that the broader system is less exposed to repeated transport shocks.
- Modernize and integrate the digital backbone for resilience. This means breaking down data silos and upgrading the digital and data architecture so that supply chain information flows freely across the enterprise and with partners.
- Align IT strategy with resilience, sustainability and regulatory goals. CIOs and CTOs should ensure that their technology strategy explicitly supports the organization’s resilience, security, sustainability and compliance objectives.
Disruption in oil and gas is no longer temporary noise. It is a new operating condition. The companies and countries that respond best will not be the ones waiting for stability to return. They will be the ones redesigning their supply chains now, with more optionality, more visibility and more resilience built in from the start.
FAQs
What is driving supply chain disruption in Oil & Gas today?
A combination of shifting trade flows, route instability, concentrated transit risk and greater cost volatility has made disruption more structural than episodic.
Why has diversification become so important?
Too much dependence on a single source, route or supplier increases exposure when market conditions change suddenly. Diversification creates more flexibility and reduces concentration risk.
What areas of oil and gas are most affected operationally?
Sourcing, logistics, production planning, freight allocation and commercial trading decisions are all under greater pressure in a more volatile operating environment.
How can AI help improve resilience in oil and gas?
AI can support real-time trade tracking, scenario planning, route optimization and faster supply-demand decision-making across increasingly complex networks.
What should leaders focus on next in the oil and gas industry?
Diversified supply architecture, real-time visibility, stronger decision coordination and selective AI-enabled decision support should all be high priorities.
